1812, 1912, or 2012: which was the year of the second highest number of new abortion restrictions?
I keep forgetting what century we live in.
I appreciate (and agree wholeheartedly with) Obama’s response to Akin:
Rape is rape… What I think these comments do underscore is why we shouldn’t have a bunch of politicians, the majority of which are men, making decisions that affect the health of women.
However, I still haven’t forgotten Obama’s condescending response on the emergency contraception ruling last year, where he (also a politician and a man) made a decision that affects women’s health that is not backed up by scientific facts:
As the father of two daughters, I think it is important for us to make sure that we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over the counter medicine. The reason Kathleen made this decision is that she could not be confident that a 10-year-old or 11-year-old going to a drug store would be able to, alongside bubble gum or batteries be able to buy a medication that potentially if not used properly can have an adverse effect.
In fact, this ruling disregarded the recommendations of FDA scientists.
Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) effectively defunded his state’s Planned Parenthood earlier this year by barring it and any other “abortion affiliates” from receiving funds under the Texas Women’s Health Program (TWHP). The government eventually cut off the program for not complying with the law, but Perry insisted he’d continue it — but on his own terms.
It turns out those terms mean blocking funding for anyone who even talks about abortion.
In a letter explaining the Texas Department of Health and Human Services’s proposed new rules, they have expanded their ban from “affiliates” (abortion providers or clinics attached to abortion providers) to “promoters” and those who affiliate with “promoters.”..
Banning “promotion” effectively means banning any women’s health care provider who mentions the word abortion or has informational material about how a woman might be able to seek out the procedure. Banning those who affiliate with someone who promotes abortion even further broadens the number of facilities that will not be able to recieve state funds.
This is outrageous! Women of Texas, take note.
See this and more on my Pinterest War on Women wall of shame.
Thirty-two million people will gain access to health care insurance coverage including sixteen million people who will gain access through Medicaid. What does this mean for individuals with vaginae/uteri? How will this affect our health and healthcare coverage?
(Excerpts taken from a recent Feminist Majority post)
Subsidies to purchase coverage
Bans Discrimination
No Co-Pays or Deductibles for Preventive Care including Birth Control
Discrimination Based on Pre-Existing Conditions Eliminated
Bans Insurers from Dropping Coverage Because of Illness
Mandatory Coverage of Maternity Care and Specific Health Services
Mental Health Parity
Benefits for Older People
Ban on Discrimination against Lower Paid Employees
Addresses National Nursing and Primary Care Physicians Shortage
*Update: I changed the title to reflect how the Affordable Care Act will affect individuals with vaginae/uteri — not just those people who self-identify as women.
..because Pinterest can be a tool for more than just pretty dresses and wedding planning.
I woke up this morning and my uterus was really heavy…and then I realized the religious right was sitting on it.
A bill declaring a fertilized egg to be a “person” with constitutional rights has passed the Oklahoma Senate. The bill is expected to pass the Republican-controlled House and be signed into law by the state’s anti-abortion governor, Mary Fallin.
Personhood laws would drastically limit women’s medical options:
By giving constitutional rights to a fertilized egg, the amendment could ban emergency contraception, birth control pills and IUDs as well as all abortions, even in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the woman or girl. It could eliminate medical choices for women, such as some cancer treatments or in vitro fertilization. It could allow the state to investigate and even prosecute a woman for a miscarriage.
Such measures have been unpopular with voters. A personhood measure on Mississippi’s November ballot suffered a resounding defeat. But personhood’s proponents are pressing on in 2012, with campaigns in 11 states and counting.
Poor women are now at greater risk for breast cancer death because of less access to screening and better treatments.
Give Rick Santorum this much credit for influencing the debate: His open hostility to contraception has managed to reframe things such that in Saturday night’s debate, George Stephanopoulos took the unusual step of asking Mitt Romney if he thought states should be able to ban contraception. Romney responded first by playing dumb and hedging, then by not answering the question at all.
“George, this is an unusual topic that you’re raising,” Romney responded, as if he didn’t know that Santorum’s re-stated opposition to Griswold put contraception policies back on the table. “States have the right to ban contraception? I can’t imagine that states would want to ban contraception. If I were a governor or a legislator in a state, I would totally oppose any effort to ban contraception. So you’re asking — given the fact that there’s no state that wants to do so — you are asking could it constitutionally be done? We could ask our constitutionalist here,” at which point he punted to Ron Paul. (Paul, of course, is anti-choice and wanted to talk about the Patriot Act instead.)…
Romney might even get a break on a question he called “kind of a silly thing.” His audience may not remember that, in fact, states once did firmly ban contraception and information about it for even married couples, as the Connecticut statute in Griswold did. But it’s not silly to ask him his stance on either a settled legal doctrine or a set of current policy issues surrounding reproductive health. Should contraception continue to be fully covered under the Affordable Care Act (the existence of which he opposes)? Can pharmacists decline to fill prescriptions for Plan B (he wants to make it easier for them not to)? What about the defunding of Planned Parenthood, which provides contraceptive services to millions of people (Romney wants it to happen).
“Contraception?” Romney repeated last night. “It’s working just fine, leave it alone.” If only they would.